intellectual property right
- North America > United States > Texas (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > National Capital Region > Ottawa (0.13)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.13)
- (44 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Overview (1.00)
- (2 more...)
- Transportation > Passenger (1.00)
- Transportation > Air (1.00)
- Leisure & Entertainment (1.00)
- (25 more...)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > National Capital Region > Ottawa (0.13)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.13)
- (45 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Overview (1.00)
- (2 more...)
- Transportation > Passenger (1.00)
- Transportation > Air (1.00)
- Leisure & Entertainment (1.00)
- (26 more...)
Scarlett Johansson's OpenAI clash is just the start of legal wrangles over artificial intelligence
When OpenAI's new voice assistant said it was "doing fantastic" in a launch demo this month, Scarlett Johansson was not. The Hollywood star said she was "shocked, angered and in disbelief" that the updated version of ChatGPT, which can listen to spoken prompts and respond verbally, had a voice "eerily similar" to hers. One of Johansson's signature roles was as the voice of a futuristic version of Siri in the 2013 film Her and, for the actor, the similarity was stark. The OpenAI chief executive, Sam Altman, appeared to acknowledge the film's influence with a one-word post on X on the day of the launch: "her". In a statement, Johansson said Altman had approached her last year to be a voice of ChatGPT and that she had declined for "personal reasons".
- North America > United States > Tennessee (0.05)
- North America > United States > California (0.05)
- Media > Film (1.00)
- Leisure & Entertainment (1.00)
- Law > Litigation (0.72)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.49)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning > Generative AI (1.00)
Generative AI in EU Law: Liability, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and Cybersecurity
Novelli, Claudio, Casolari, Federico, Hacker, Philipp, Spedicato, Giorgio, Floridi, Luciano
The advent of Generative AI, particularly through Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and its successors, marks a paradigm shift in the AI landscape. Advanced LLMs exhibit multimodality, handling diverse data formats, thereby broadening their application scope. However, the complexity and emergent autonomy of these models introduce challenges in predictability and legal compliance. This paper delves into the legal and regulatory implications of Generative AI and LLMs in the European Union context, analyzing aspects of liability, privacy, intellectual property, and cybersecurity. It critically examines the adequacy of the existing and proposed EU legislation, including the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) draft, in addressing the unique challenges posed by Generative AI in general and LLMs in particular. The paper identifies potential gaps and shortcomings in the legislative framework and proposes recommendations to ensure the safe and compliant deployment of generative models, ensuring they align with the EU's evolving digital landscape and legal standards.
- North America > United States > New York > Monroe County > Rochester (0.05)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- (8 more...)
- Law > Statutes (1.00)
- Law > Intellectual Property & Technology Law (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Generation (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning > Generative AI (1.00)
Generative AI and US Intellectual Property Law
The rapidity with which generative AI has been adopted and advanced has raised legal and ethical questions related to the impact on artists rights, content production, data collection, privacy, accuracy of information, and intellectual property rights. Recent administrative and case law challenges have shown that generative AI software systems do not have independent intellectual property rights in the content that they generate. It remains to be seen whether human content creators can retain their intellectual property rights against generative AI software, its developers, operators, and owners for the misappropriation of the work of human creatives, given the metes and bounds of existing law. Early signs from various courts are mixed as to whether and to what degree the results generated by AI models meet the legal standards of infringement under existing law.
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Santa Monica (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Harris County > Spring (0.04)
- (2 more...)
Google indemnifies generative AI customers over IP rights claims
Google announced on Thursday that it will protect its generative AI customers against any intellectual property claims made on the data used or output served by Google-hosted AI models. By extending protection in its cloud and workspace environments, Google joins the list of technology firms that have recently announced IP support for using their own generative AI tools. These include companies like IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, and Adobe. Google said the protection would span across all Google environments using the Duet AI collaborator, and the company's homegrown generative AI engine Vertex AI. The indemnity clause by leading technology companies will likely bring in hope as generative AI's challenges over privacy, security, and intellectual property violations peak.
- Information Technology (1.00)
- Law > Intellectual Property & Technology Law (0.66)
LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
Guha, Neel, Nyarko, Julian, Ho, Daniel E., Ré, Christopher, Chilton, Adam, Narayana, Aditya, Chohlas-Wood, Alex, Peters, Austin, Waldon, Brandon, Rockmore, Daniel N., Zambrano, Diego, Talisman, Dmitry, Hoque, Enam, Surani, Faiz, Fagan, Frank, Sarfaty, Galit, Dickinson, Gregory M., Porat, Haggai, Hegland, Jason, Wu, Jessica, Nudell, Joe, Niklaus, Joel, Nay, John, Choi, Jonathan H., Tobia, Kevin, Hagan, Margaret, Ma, Megan, Livermore, Michael, Rasumov-Rahe, Nikon, Holzenberger, Nils, Kolt, Noam, Henderson, Peter, Rehaag, Sean, Goel, Sharad, Gao, Shang, Williams, Spencer, Gandhi, Sunny, Zur, Tom, Iyer, Varun, Li, Zehua
The advent of large language models (LLMs) and their adoption by the legal community has given rise to the question: what types of legal reasoning can LLMs perform? To enable greater study of this question, we present LegalBench: a collaboratively constructed legal reasoning benchmark consisting of 162 tasks covering six different types of legal reasoning. LegalBench was built through an interdisciplinary process, in which we collected tasks designed and hand-crafted by legal professionals. Because these subject matter experts took a leading role in construction, tasks either measure legal reasoning capabilities that are practically useful, or measure reasoning skills that lawyers find interesting. To enable cross-disciplinary conversations about LLMs in the law, we additionally show how popular legal frameworks for describing legal reasoning -- which distinguish between its many forms -- correspond to LegalBench tasks, thus giving lawyers and LLM developers a common vocabulary. This paper describes LegalBench, presents an empirical evaluation of 20 open-source and commercial LLMs, and illustrates the types of research explorations LegalBench enables.
- North America > United States > Texas (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > National Capital Region > Ottawa (0.13)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.13)
- (45 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Overview (1.00)
- (2 more...)
- Transportation > Passenger (1.00)
- Transportation > Air (1.00)
- Law > Statutes (1.00)
- (24 more...)
Empowering Business Transformation: The Positive Impact and Ethical Considerations of Generative AI in Software Product Management -- A Systematic Literature Review
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has made outstanding strides in recent years, with a good-sized impact on software product management. Drawing on pertinent articles from 2016 to 2023, this systematic literature evaluation reveals generative AI's potential applications, benefits, and constraints in this area. The study shows that technology can assist in idea generation, market research, customer insights, product requirements engineering, and product development. It can help reduce development time and costs through automatic code generation, customer feedback analysis, and more. However, the technology's accuracy, reliability, and ethical consideration persist. Ultimately, generative AI's practical application can significantly improve software product management activities, leading to more efficient use of resources, better product outcomes, and improved end-user experiences.
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Overview (1.00)
- Law (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Banking & Finance (0.67)
Does ChatGPT Violate Compliance Rules & Policies [Marketer Guide]
The fuss around artificial intelligence(AI) has recently been the bone of contention. In fact, AI is disrupting virtually all sectors. Imagine if we get to a point where AI does all your tasks for you. And you'd ask–what would be left for me to do? Sure, you'd still have to feed yourself and, perhaps, take your bath yourself. Who assigns those to AI? We're at such an exciting point in the world, and one of the generative AI tools making rounds recently is ChatGPT.
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.99)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning > Generative AI (0.42)
'Deepfake chaos': The new AI that can mimic your voice perfectly
A new chatbot, similar to ChatGPT, is able to turn text into celebrity voices, creating "deepfakes" in the style of Morgan Freedman, Jordan Peterson, Donald Trump and many more. NoiseGPT can even be trained by users to imitate their own voice, or that of their friends, family members or work colleagues. Imagine getting a happy birthday voice-message from your favourite US president, or a voice from beyond the grave in the form of John Lennon or Elvis sharing some personal information with you, that only your closest relatives know about. This is the selling point of the newest chatbot application to be released following the much-hyped launch of Microsoft-backed (MSFT) ChatGPT artificial intelligence content generator in November 2022. NoiseGPT's chief operational officer Frankie Peartree told Yahoo Finance UK: "We are training the AI to mimic around 25 celebrity voices at the moment, and will soon have 100 plus celebrity voices to offer."
- North America > United States (0.57)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.25)